Page history
17 December 2022
→4th Logo (November 22, 2022-): Let's not mention any sequels, just to be safe.
+88
Undo revision 440021 by LathanBarb (talk) This appears to be speculation.
−109
→4th Logo (November 22, 2022-)
+109
15 December 2022
11 December 2022
no edit summary
−16
+Category:Logos made by Pacific Data Images; +Category:Logos made by yU+co using HotCat
+80
8 December 2022
6 December 2022
"The previous two logos' themes" as though the 3rd logo used the Fairytale theme....
+44
Text replacement - "FX/SFX:" to "Technique:"
m+12
5 December 2022
4 December 2022
Added some more info from The Hollywood Reporter.
+153
Legacy section on the 3rd logo made no sense, added the online reaction to the 4th logo in its legacy section
+63
3 December 2022
→1st Logo (May 15, 2004-November 17, 2009)
+10
→4th Logo (November 22, 2022-)
+5
Undo revision 410041 by ShawnTehLogoBoi (talk) That was vandalism; their not even opinionated at all!
+509
→2nd Logo (February 1, 2009-June 2, 2017, October 9, 2020, July 2, 2021)
−4
1 December 2022
no edit summary
+91
→4th Logo (November 22, 2022-)
−616
Legacy isn't for expressing opinions.
−186
no edit summary
+907
30 November 2022
29 November 2022
no edit summary
−509
→3rd Logo (November 24, 2017-)
+52
no edit summary
−45
no edit summary
+108
Very strange, also belongs in Trivia anyway
−88
→2nd Logo (February 1, 2009-June 2, 2017, October 9, 2020, July 2, 2021)
+70
28 November 2022
→4th Logo (November 22, 2022-): it's -> its
−1
no edit summary
−28
Bruh we misusing Trivia over here apparently, that dot point just describes what's visually happening
−73
→3rd Logo (November 24, 2017-): This logo is not yet confirmed to be retired.
+24
no edit summary
no edit summary
+264
27 November 2022
no edit summary
+72
no edit summary
−333
no edit summary
+5
→4th Logo (November 22, 2022-)
m+5
→4th Logo (November 22, 2022-)
+24
no edit summary
+391
no edit summary
+10
→4th Logo (November 22, 2022-): Puss in Boots: The Last Wish already had its sneak preview and this logo was shown on it
−11
I will still change the gradients though. Yes, that's kinda hard to read
+3
That same argument should go to The General's 1st logo then. Undo revision 408129 by MinistrycraftEntertainment (talk)
+323
Who's bright idea was it to use gradients like that in a description? Really wasn't necessary and made the text harder to read.
−323