User talk:Camenati: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→RfC rejection: new section
imported>Camenati |
imported>TapLover (→RfC rejection: new section) |
||
| Line 389: | Line 389: | ||
[[User:AbstractWB|AbstractWB]] ([[User talk:AbstractWB|talk]]) 15:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC) | [[User:AbstractWB|AbstractWB]] ([[User talk:AbstractWB|talk]]) 15:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Those are enough for the variant to be its own section, plus how the text's formation is animated differently (they flip in at a wider angle and have a glass texture to them compared to the TV version). If the variant has plenty of major differences compared to the normal logo such as the background, redesigned animation of the same sequence (e.g. the 2009 20th Century Fox logo), etc., then it can be spun off into its own section using the same subheaders from the previous logo descriptions. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 16:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC) | : Those are enough for the variant to be its own section, plus how the text's formation is animated differently (they flip in at a wider angle and have a glass texture to them compared to the TV version). If the variant has plenty of major differences compared to the normal logo such as the background, redesigned animation of the same sequence (e.g. the 2009 20th Century Fox logo), etc., then it can be spun off into its own section using the same subheaders from the previous logo descriptions. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 16:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
== RfC rejection == | |||
After seeing that you rejected the RfC I made today about the CinemaSins page no one cares about, I just copy-and-pasted my rant into the talk section of the page I in question. Is this acceptable? [[User:TapLover|TapLover]] ([[User talk:TapLover|talk]]) 20:32, 3 January 2024 (UTC) | |||