The Audiovisual Identity Database:User Reports: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Audiovisual Identity Database:User Reports (view source)
Revision as of 12:25, 11 April 2023
, 11 April 2023→TheRealMarcel2000: Reply
imported>JrStudios (→Korea1: Reply) |
imported>IAmThe789Guy (→TheRealMarcel2000: Reply) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::::Compooper has also said that an indefinite ban is too far too soon [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 13:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | ::::Compooper has also said that an indefinite ban is too far too soon [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 13:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::As the person who reported him I'd rather it be a temp ban than a indefinite. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 15:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | :::::As the person who reported him I'd rather it be a temp ban than a indefinite. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 15:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::::Okay, let's be honest. I might have gotten overboard (because, not counting Matthew's false banning) he had been banned twice prior to this, and they were three days tops. Maybe I was jumping the gun, but yeah, he has been warned and banned enough times for doing this nonsense repeatedly. Since we're all concerned about indef-banning him, I propose it'd be a temp ban for a week(tops) just so he'll learn not to add blank sections further beyond this point. [[User:IAmThe789Guy|IAmThe789Guy]] ([[User talk:IAmThe789Guy|talk]]) 12:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
== [[User:Minionbud|Minionbud]] == | == [[User:Minionbud|Minionbud]] == |