The Audiovisual Identity Database:User Reports: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Audiovisual Identity Database:User Reports (view source)
Revision as of 17:14, 7 June 2023
, 7 June 2023Fixing header so it no longer acts as a link to a non-existent user.
imported>StudioLerex |
imported>Gilby1385 (Fixing header so it no longer acts as a link to a non-existent user.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{/Intro}} | {{/Intro}} | ||
== | == Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned == | ||
[[User_Talk:Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|Contributions]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|Deleted contributions]] · [[Special:Log/Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|All logs]] · [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=block&page=User:{{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned}}}}}} Block log] · [[Special:Block/Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|Block]]<br>Sorry, didn't know where to go. Disputing some cut parts on [[Filmstaden AB]]. When I made the page I Google translated plenty of YouTube comments to find these opinions and confirm that they were quite unanimous in Sweden. I feel like some users act like we banned Legacy completely when we just banned hyperbole and unsourced "this logo is good" statements, hence why I altered some of these entries as they admittedly contained the latter. And that Nicole Kidman intro really is a meme. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/nicole-kidmans-amc-commercial Therefore, I request a mod readd these in my opinion valid legacies as the page won't let me edit thinking it is describing what moves in Technique instead of the medium, which it isn't, and the talk page weirdly won't allow edits for the same reason, and neither will even the reports. Therefore, I have nowhere to even suggest my rewrites as the bot overzealously thinks I am acting like a vandal. If I'm in the wrong, I'm sorry I always ruin everything. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 22:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | [[User_Talk:Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|Talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|Contributions]] · [[Special:DeletedContributions/Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|Deleted contributions]] · [[Special:Log/Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|All logs]] · [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=block&page=User:{{urlencode:{{ucfirst:Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned}}}}}} Block log] · [[Special:Block/Requesting mod action, no one needs to be banned|Block]]<br>Sorry, didn't know where to go. Disputing some cut parts on [[Filmstaden AB]]. When I made the page I Google translated plenty of YouTube comments to find these opinions and confirm that they were quite unanimous in Sweden. I feel like some users act like we banned Legacy completely when we just banned hyperbole and unsourced "this logo is good" statements, hence why I altered some of these entries as they admittedly contained the latter. And that Nicole Kidman intro really is a meme. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/nicole-kidmans-amc-commercial Therefore, I request a mod readd these in my opinion valid legacies as the page won't let me edit thinking it is describing what moves in Technique instead of the medium, which it isn't, and the talk page weirdly won't allow edits for the same reason, and neither will even the reports. Therefore, I have nowhere to even suggest my rewrites as the bot overzealously thinks I am acting like a vandal. If I'm in the wrong, I'm sorry I always ruin everything. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 22:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | ||